Arun Kannawadi
Observational Cosmologist. Research Software Engineer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/513f6/513f69771011923e816929bccaebd3a9a9b81e87" alt="prof_pic.jpg"
I am an astrophysicist and a researcher in cosmology, the study of origin and evolution of the Universe. I am a faculty member (assistant research professor) in the Physics department at Duke University. Previously, I was a member of the research staff (associate research scholar) at the Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University.
I am interested in answering the questions about the distribution of (dark) matter in the Universe, also known as the large-scale structure and using it to understand the contents (dark matter and dark energy) of the Universe. To achieve this goal, I use various statistical techniques on large datasets obtained with telescopes, from ground and in space.
On a day-to-day basis, I work on image processing pipelines and algorithms that work at raw pixel-level data to extract useful information from millions (soon to be billions) of galaxies namely galaxy fluxes (and colors) and shapes. I am a member of the Data Management team of the Rubin Observatory project and I am in-charge of the software pipeline measuring the signal of weak gravitational lensing from the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST).
selected publications
- MNRASMitigating the effects of undersampling in weak lensing shear estimation with metacalibrationArun Kannawadi, Erik Rosenberg, and Henk HoekstraMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Apr 2021
METACALIBRATION is a state-of-the-art technique for measuring weak gravitational lensing shear from well-sampled galaxy images. We investigate the accuracy of shear measured with METACALIBRATION from fitting elliptical Gaussians to undersampled galaxy images. In this case, METACALIBRATION introduces aliasing effects leading to an ensemble multiplicative shear bias about 0.01 for Euclid and even larger for the Roman Space Telescope, well exceeding the missions’ requirements. We find that this aliasing bias can be mitigated by computing shapes from weighted moments with wider Gaussians as weight functions, thereby trading bias for a slight increase in variance of the measurements. We show that this approach is robust to the point-spread function in consideration and meets the stringent requirements of Euclid for galaxies with moderate to high signal-to-noise ratios. We therefore advocate METACALIBRATION as a viable shear measurement option for weak lensing from upcoming space missions.
@article{2021MNRAS.502.4048K, adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}, adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502.4048K}, archiveprefix = {arXiv}, author = {{Kannawadi}, Arun and {Rosenberg}, Erik and {Hoekstra}, Henk}, custom_keywords = {first}, doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab211}, eprint = {2010.04164}, journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society}, keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, methods: observational, cosmology: observations, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics}, month = apr, number = {3}, pages = {4048-4063}, primaryclass = {astro-ph.IM}, title = {{Mitigating the effects of undersampling in weak lensing shear estimation with metacalibration}}, volume = {502}, year = {2021} }
- A&AKiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraintsCatherine Heymans, Tilman Tröster, Marika Asgari, and 31 more authorsAstronomy and Astrophysics, Feb 2021
We present a joint cosmological analysis of weak gravitational lensing observations from the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000), with redshift-space galaxy clustering observations from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) and galaxy-galaxy lensing observations from the overlap between KiDS-1000, BOSS, and the spectroscopic 2-degree Field Lensing Survey. This combination of large-scale structure probes breaks the degeneracies between cosmological parameters for individual observables, resulting in a constraint on the structure growth parameter S_8 = \ensuremathσ_8\ensuremath\sqr t(\ensuremathΩ_m/0.3) = 0.766_-0.014^+0.020, which has the same overall precision as that reported by the full-sky cosmic microwave background observations from Planck. The recovered S_8 amplitude is low, however, by 8.3 \ensuremath\pm 2.6% relative to Planck. This result builds from a series of KiDS-1000 analyses where we validate our methodology with variable depth mock galaxy surveys, our lensing calibration with image simulations and null-tests, and our optical-to-near- infrared redshift calibration with multi-band mock catalogues and a spectroscopic-photometric clustering analysis. The systematic uncertainties identified by these analyses are folded through as nuisance parameters in our cosmological analysis. Inspecting the offset between the marginalised posterior distributions, we find that the S_8-difference with Planck is driven by a tension in the matter fluctuation amplitude parameter, \ensuremathσ_8. We quantify the level of agreement between the cosmic microwave background and our large- scale structure constraints using a series of different metrics, finding differences with a significance ranging between \ensuremath∼3\ensuremathσ, when considering the offset in S_8, and \ensuremath∼2\ensuremathσ, when considering the full multi-dimensional parameter space.
@article{2021A&A...646A.140H, adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}, adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...646A.140H}, archiveprefix = {arXiv}, author = {{Heymans}, Catherine and {Tr{\"o}ster}, Tilman and {Asgari}, Marika and {Blake}, Chris and {Hildebrandt}, Hendrik and {Joachimi}, Benjamin and {Kuijken}, Konrad and {Lin}, Chieh-An and {S{\'a}nchez}, Ariel G. and {van den Busch}, Jan Luca and {Wright}, Angus H. and {Amon}, Alexandra and {Bilicki}, Maciej and {de Jong}, Jelte and {Crocce}, Martin and {Dvornik}, Andrej and {Erben}, Thomas and {Fortuna}, Maria Cristina and {Getman}, Fedor and {Giblin}, Benjamin and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Hoekstra}, Henk and {Joudaki}, Shahab and {Kannawadi}, Arun and {K{\"o}hlinger}, Fabian and {Lidman}, Chris and {Miller}, Lance and {Napolitano}, Nicola R. and {Parkinson}, David and {Schneider}, Peter and {Shan}, HuanYuan and {Valentijn}, Edwin A. and {Verdoes Kleijn}, Gijs and {Wolf}, Christian}, doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202039063}, eid = {A140}, eprint = {2007.15632}, journal = {Astronomy and Astrophysics}, keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, methods: data analysis, methods: statistical, surveys, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics}, month = feb, pages = {A140}, primaryclass = {astro-ph.CO}, title = {{KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints}}, volume = {646}, year = {2021} }
- A&AAccounting for object detection bias in weak gravitational lensing studiesHenk Hoekstra, Arun Kannawadi, and Thomas D. KitchingAstronomy and Astrophysics, Feb 2021
Weak lensing by large-scale structure is a powerful probe of cosmology if the apparent alignments in the shapes of distant galaxies can be accurately measured. Most studies have therefore focused on improving the fidelity of the shape measurements themselves, but the preceding step of object detection has been largely ignored. In this paper, we study the impact of object detection for a Euclid-like survey and show that it leads to biases that exceed requirements for the next generation of cosmic shear surveys. In realistic scenarios, the blending of galaxies is an important source of detection bias. We find that METADETECTION is able to account for blending, leading to average multiplicative biases that meet requirements for Stage IV surveys, provided a sufficiently accurate model for the point spread function is available. Further work is needed to estimate the performance for actual surveys. Combined with sufficiently realistic image simulations, this provides a viable way forward towards accurate shear estimates for Stage IV surveys.
@article{2021A&A...646A.124H, adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}, adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...646A.124H}, archiveprefix = {arXiv}, author = {{Hoekstra}, Henk and {Kannawadi}, Arun and {Kitching}, Thomas D.}, custom_keywords = {first}, doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202038998}, eid = {A124}, eprint = {2010.04178}, journal = {Astronomy and Astrophysics}, keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics}, month = feb, pages = {A124}, primaryclass = {astro-ph.CO}, title = {{Accounting for object detection bias in weak gravitational lensing studies}}, volume = {646}, year = {2021} }
- A&AKiDS+VIKING-450: Cosmic shear tomography with optical and infrared dataH. Hildebrandt, F. Köhlinger, J. L. van den Busch, and 25 more authorsAstronomy and Astrophysics, Jan 2020
We present a tomographic cosmic shear analysis of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) combined with the VISTA Kilo-Degree Infrared Galaxy Survey. This is the first time that a full optical to near- infrared data set has been used for a wide-field cosmological weak lensing experiment. This unprecedented data, spanning 450 deg^2, allows us to significantly improve the estimation of photometric redshifts, such that we are able to include robustly higher-redshift sources for the lensing measurement, and - most importantly - to solidify our knowledge of the redshift distributions of the sources. Based on a flat \ensuremathΛCDM model we find S_8 \ensuremath≡ \ensuremathσ_8 \ensuremathΩ_m/0.3 = 0.737^+0.040_-0.036 in a blind analysis from cosmic shear alone. The tension between KiDS cosmic shear and the Planck-Legacy CMB measurements remains in this systematically more robust analysis, with S_8 differing by 2.3\ensuremathσ. This result is insensitive to changes in the priors on nuisance parameters for intrinsic alignment, baryon feedback, and neutrino mass. KiDS shear measurements are calibrated with a new, more realistic set of image simulations and no significant B-modes are detected in the survey, indicating that systematic errors are under control. When calibrating our redshift distributions by assuming the 30-band COSMOS-2015 photometric redshifts are correct (following the Dark Energy Survey and the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey), we find the tension with Planck is alleviated. The robust determination of source redshift distributions remains one of the most challenging aspects for future cosmic shear surveys. \\textbackslashData products from this analysis are available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (ftp://130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz- bin/cat/J/A+A/633/A69 and at http://kids.strw.leidenuniv.nl
@article{2020A&A...633A..69H, adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}, adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...633A..69H}, archiveprefix = {arXiv}, author = {{Hildebrandt}, H. and {K{\"o}hlinger}, F. and {van den Busch}, J.~L. and {Joachimi}, B. and {Heymans}, C. and {Kannawadi}, A. and {Wright}, A.~H. and {Asgari}, M. and {Blake}, C. and {Hoekstra}, H. and {Joudaki}, S. and {Kuijken}, K. and {Miller}, L. and {Morrison}, C.~B. and {Tr{\"o}ster}, T. and {Amon}, A. and {Archidiacono}, M. and {Brieden}, S. and {Choi}, A. and {de Jong}, J.~T.~A. and {Erben}, T. and {Giblin}, B. and {Mead}, A. and {Peacock}, J.~A. and {Radovich}, M. and {Schneider}, P. and {Sif{\'o}n}, C. and {Tewes}, M.}, doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201834878}, eid = {A69}, eprint = {1812.06076}, journal = {Astronomy and Astrophysics}, keywords = {cosmology: observations, gravitational lensing: weak, galaxies: photometry, surveys, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics}, month = jan, pages = {A69}, primaryclass = {astro-ph.CO}, title = {{KiDS+VIKING-450: Cosmic shear tomography with optical and infrared data}}, volume = {633}, year = {2020} }
- A&ATowards emulating cosmic shear data: revisiting the calibration of the shear measurements for the Kilo-Degree SurveyArun Kannawadi, Henk Hoekstra, Lance Miller, and 9 more authorsAstronomy and Astrophysics, Apr 2019
Exploiting the full statistical power of future cosmic shear surveys will necessitate improvements to the accuracy with which the gravitational lensing signal is measured. We present a framework for calibrating shear with image simulations that demonstrates the importance of including realistic correlations between galaxy morphology, size, and more importantly, photometric redshifts. This realism is essential to ensure that selection and shape measurement biases can be calibrated accurately for a tomographic cosmic shear analysis. We emulate Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) observations of the COSMOS field using morphological information from Hubble Space Telescope imaging, faithfully reproducing the measured galaxy properties from KiDS observations of the same field. We calibrate our shear measurements from lensfit, and find through a range of sensitivity tests that lensfit is robust and unbiased within the allowed two per cent tolerance of our study. Our results show that the calibration has to be performed by selecting the tomographic samples in the simulations, consistent with the actual cosmic shear analysis, because the joint distributions of galaxy properties are found to vary with redshift. Ignoring this redshift variation could result in misestimating the shear bias by an amount that exceeds the allowed tolerance. To improve the calibration for future cosmic shear analyses, it will also be essential to correctly account for the measurement of photometric redshifts, which requires simulating multi-band observations.
@article{2019A&A...624A..92K, adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}, adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...624A..92K}, archiveprefix = {arXiv}, author = {{Kannawadi}, Arun and {Hoekstra}, Henk and {Miller}, Lance and {Viola}, Massimo and {Fenech Conti}, Ian and {Herbonnet}, Ricardo and {Erben}, Thomas and {Heymans}, Catherine and {Hildebrandt}, Hendrik and {Kuijken}, Konrad and {Vakili}, Mohammadjavad and {Wright}, Angus H.}, custom_keywords = {first}, doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201834819}, eid = {A92}, eprint = {1812.03983}, journal = {Astronomy and Astrophysics}, keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmological parameters, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics}, month = apr, pages = {A92}, primaryclass = {astro-ph.CO}, title = {{Towards emulating cosmic shear data: revisiting the calibration of the shear measurements for the Kilo-Degree Survey}}, volume = {624}, year = {2019} }